[OT] D. Walter's and Andrei's talk

[BCS]

Reply to Ary,

> BCS wrote:
> 
>> Reply to Ary,
>> 
>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>> 
>>>> BCS wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Any chance this could be a excuse for getting the D ddoc stuff in
>>>>> a format that can be converted to .tex? The only major issue there
>>>>> is that it has lots of HTML tag hard coded in.
>>>>> 
>>>> One of my goals is to get Ddoc to generate .tex output as well as
>>>> html. What's stood in the way is I don't know latex, but that's
>>>> changing.
>>>> 
>>> Isn't Ddoc already prepared for generating non-HTML documentation,
>>> because of macros?
>>> 
>> yes, but Walter doesn't have the D docs set up to generate anything
>> but HTML.
>> 
> Oh, I see. Phobo's Ddoc is using HTML instead of macros... no?
> 

Phobo's Ddoc is using HTML _AND_ macros. (it was HTML to start with and has 
slowly been turning into macros)