Sean Kelly wrote:
> One thing that concerns me. If we assume that "enum x = 3" is simply
> shorthand for "enum { x = 3 }" then all such declarations would be
> implicitly typed as integers, which doesn't sound like you want. It
> seems you're suggesting "enum" be treated more like a storage class
> here? I'm not sure if I like that idea.
Why not
macro x = 3;
?