const again

[guslay]

Denton Cockburn Wrote:

> 
> You've mentioned this already, but D's already got too many keywords.  I 
> think enum/macro is fine if it's explained in the docs.
> 
> Let's not add more keywords, esp. for minimal net benefit.

Having specific, obvious keywords for different concepts may cause less confusion than selecting a loosely related keyword from the existing pool based on a best match approach.

But then again I am not the one who pays for implementing it so it's easy to say.