Any word on the return-type const syntax?

Janice Caron caron800 at googlemail.com
Fri Dec 7 11:56:24 PST 2007


I know there was a suggestion in the Walter/Andrei document, but has
it been finalised?

I'm referring to the ability to define the constancy/invariance of the
return type in terms of the constancy/invariance of a calling
parameter, in order to avoid having to write the same function three
times.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list