Any word on the return-type const syntax?

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Fri Dec 7 19:55:44 PST 2007


Bill Baxter wrote:
> I was hoping the return thing would let us define virtual methods.  A 
> template solution won't allow that currently.  Is there a plan to change 
> that?

Not at the moment.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list