A smaller GC benchmark
Vladimir Panteleev
thecybershadow at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 09:59:07 PST 2007
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:56:10 +0200, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote:
>
> Note that I test the GC of Phobos only, I don't use Tango yet.
I did some tests with Tango (head SVN).
Specs: Core Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz per core, running Windows
Phobos time: 3.140 seconds
Tango time: 1.859 seconds
Times are best of 3 runs, like your tests.
I didn't measure memory usage, but it's pretty obvious that the Tango GC is significantly faster (in this case, at least) than the Phobos version.
--
Best regards,
Vladimir mailto:thecybershadow at gmail.com
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list