A smaller GC benchmark

[Sean Kelly]

Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:56:10 +0200, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote:
> 
>> Note that I test the GC of Phobos only, I don't use Tango yet.
> 
> I did some tests with Tango (head SVN).
> 
> Specs:       Core Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz per core, running Windows
> Phobos time: 3.140 seconds
> Tango time:  1.859 seconds
> 
> Times are best of 3 runs, like your tests.
> I didn't measure memory usage, but it's pretty obvious that the Tango GC is significantly faster (in this case, at least) than the Phobos version.
> 

Nifty.


Sean