Proposal: static template(fail)

[Leandro Lucarella]

Janice Caron, el 13 de diciembre a las 19:47 me escribiste:
> On 12/13/07, Gregor Richards <Richards at codu.org> wrote:
> > I think a different
> > syntax would be good, but the idea is sound.
> 
> Hey, we always argue about the syntax. It's a tradition! :-)
> 
> Yeah, I don't care about the syntax. I though of "static break" first,
> but then I thought that might conflict with possible future features
> (static switch/case/break anyone?). "template(fail)" was the best I
> could come up with quickly, but probably not the best we can do
> between us.

template break? =)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Lidiar" no es lo mismo que "holguear"; ya que "lidiar" es relativo a
"lidia" y "holguear" es relativo a "olga".
	-- Ricardo Vaporeso