seeding the pot for 2.0 features

[BCS]

Reply to doob,

> I think it would be good to add a "property" keyword and maybe also
> "get" and "set". I think also would be nice to add a feature from ruby
> that i think works something like this:
> 

befor I'd go for that it rather see const aliases


class C
{
   private int foo;
   const alias Foo;
}

C c = new c;


auto cf = c.Foo; // valid

c.Foo = 2; // invalid
auto cf = &c.Foo; // invlaid

That covers the get side, and what use is the set side if you don't provide 
code? (Overriding maybe??)

I /like/ the property syntax D uses and would hate to see it discarded.