unsigned policy (implicit conversions for complex?)

[Bill Baxter]

Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email) wrote:

> Current D botches quite a few of the arithmetic conversions. Basically 
> all conversions that may lose value, meaning, or precision should not be 
> allowed implicitly. Walter is willing to fix D in accordance to that 
> rule, which would yield an implicit conversion graph as shown in:
> 
> http://erdani.org/d-implicit-conversions.pdf
> 

I notice the graph doesn't include complex types.
Is there any reason why float shouldn't be automatically converted to 
cfloat?

--bb