Alternate string literal syntax (with mixins)?

[Kristian Kilpi]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:05:14 +0200, Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 at yahoo.com>  
wrote:
>> (And because they are used to mark a part of a file as a
>> string literal, they are not actually the part of the
>> 'working code' just like the "" literals are, if you get what
>> I'm trying to say.)
> <snip>
>
> I don't....
>
> Stewart.

Well, I was thinking that there was a slight distinction between them. The  
"" literals being first class strings, and the @{ }@ literals being second  
class 'meta-like' strings. But, because both of them do ultimately the  
same thing, there is no actual distinction between them. So please ignore  
my earlier comment. ;)