Super-dee-duper D features

[Manfred Nowak]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote

<citing>
> "One of the things we should demand from a
> powerful programming language is the ability to build abstractions
> by assigning names to common patterns and then to work in terms of
> the abstractions directly." 
</citing>

Isn't there a contradiction, when one requires to use new abstractions 
but forbids reinterpretations of older ones?

-manfred