Suggestion: class/struct tuples preserve anonymous unions/structs
Jarrett Billingsley
kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 15 06:47:27 PST 2007
"Frits van Bommel" <fvbommel at REMwOVExCAPSs.nl> wrote in message
news:er1ost$mae$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> [snip code]
>>
>> Thanks for this :) I was thinking it might be possible to check the
>> .offsetofs.
>
> Something I just thought of: that code doesn't take typedefs into account.
> That loophole can be closed by using is(T Base == typedef) and inspecting
> Base recursively if it evaluates to true. Implementing this is left as an
> exercise to the reader ;).
WAITWaitwaitwait. When the *hell* was .stringof added?
:D
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list