* bogus codegen with static opAssign() usage *

[Walter Bright]

kris wrote:
> The syntax, however, is very clean. Importantly, it supports the 
> unification or /centralization/ of all those 'new' invocations. I'd go 
> so far as to say such a syntax could represent a bridge between OO and 
> scripting:
> 
> ----
> String s = "mystring";
> ----
> 
> ----
> File f = "/foo/bar.d";
> ----
> 
> ----
> Regex r = "^(.*)$";
> ----
> 
> There's a fairly wide range of simple applicability for this kinda' 
> thing. Would be great if static opAssign() could support this, or some 
> other operator were enabled?
> 
> How about it?

I don't get it. Exactly what transformation are you looking for?