aliasing base methods

[Ary Manzana]

Frank Benoit (keinfarbton) escribió:
> My point is, i want this strange rules to be removed.
> And I want the override keyword not to be a useless thing.
> 
> I propose:
> 1.) make an overload not hide base implementations
> 2.) make the override keyword required, to make it useful.
> 3.) remove the interface reimplementation rule.
> 
> What do you think?

I also agree with the three points.

Number 2 is especially useful if a function in a base class is removed. 
Inmediately you can tell which classes need to remove the overriden 
functions because they are no longer in use, and can lead to bugs.