standard library vs standard interfaces
Serg Kovrov
kovrov at no.spam
Sat Jan 20 18:22:59 PST 2007
There were always trends to throw away Phobos as standard library in
flavor of some other like Ares, Tango, or whatever. The problem is there
are lot of code (I'd say most of it) that hard-coupled with current
standard library.
So why not define well-thought, 'official' set of 'standard interfaces'
(and standard implementation), as opposite to 'standard library'. It is
not necessary for a library to fully support all interfaces, of course.
We could have than any number of third party libraries to work with, in
a 'standardized' way.
--
serg.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list