GNU Scientific Library in D

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Lars Kyllingstad" <public at kyllingen.net> wrote in message 
news:f834gc$n1q$1 at digitalmars.com...
>
> Thanks a lot, worked like a charm. But out of curiosity I would like to 
> know why. Aren't the functions in the GSL libraries expecting a field 
> named 'function' there? Or don't the names of the fields matter at all, as 
> long as the structure is the same?
>

Field names mean nothing after compilation; they're just there for the 
programmer.  They get turned into a byte offset.  So, as long as the 
structure remains the same, the code doesn't care what you call it.