Humble request at Walter: Could you _please_ fix phobos already?

[TomD]

Walter Bright Wrote:

[...]
> 
> A good patch has the following attributes:
> 
> 1) It's done based on a good understanding of how the module works and 
> how it should work.
> 
> 2) It's been tried and found to work. Saying it "seems" to work isn't 
> good enough, and leaves me with the thought that the engineering of the 
> patch will have to be completely redone.
> 
> 3) Unit tests are included to independently verify that it does, indeed, 
> work and solve the bug.
> 
> 4) The -cov switch was used to verify that all lines of the patch were 
> executed by the unit tests.
> 
> Do I consistently live up to this standard 100%? Nope, and shame on me 
> for not. And every time I don't, I get burned.

Fair enough. Maybe these guidelines should be put somewhere prominently
on the bugs&issues area. (3) and especially (4) slipped my mind.

Ciao
Tom