Why isn't DSSS ('s net portion) more widely used?

[Jason House]

Dan wrote:
> I too am interested in DSSS.  I'm a bit of a perfectionist... I've spent closer to 80 hours just tinkering with the architecture of Walnut 2.x; my issue would be with version control as well.  I would need it to allow me to produce several executables from the same source - a batch interpreter, an interactive interpreter, a dll com server jscript replacement, and a dll/lib spidermonkey replacement.  All of those ought to use the same sources.

I'd like that feature too.  In addition, I have scripts that generate d 
files.  Before I can get rid of my trusty makefiles, I need something to 
allow me to do that easily.

> 
> Is that possible?
>