Stepping back and looking at constness from another angle.

[Frits van Bommel]

Reiner Pope wrote:
> It may also 
> solve the problem of lexical closures: the escape analysis they require 
> could perhaps be done by scope.

A good point: Delegates to 'scope' entities[1] should be 'scope' 
themselves. After all, they contain a reference to a 'scope' entity.


[1] including anonymous delegates, which can be considered "delegates to 
stack frames".