Phobos licensing

[Frits van Bommel]

Pragma wrote:
> Ant wrote:
>> I just downloaded dmd 1.015.
>> still contains that license.
>>
>> :(
>>
>> Ant
> 
> Not to sound callous, but perhaps it's time the community wrote a more 
> open version of this?  Last I looked at std.loader, it was merely a 
> facade for LoadLibrary/dlopen (and related functions).

Why would it be time for that, since the original author has given 
permission to distribute the current version under a BSD-style license 
(as noted elsewhere in this thread) and the only thing left to do is to 
actually change the license text in the source files?