Do we need a time-out in D evolution?

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Thu Jun 7 13:33:42 PDT 2007


Johan Granberg wrote:
> Didn't Walter say that he would branch the compiler into a current stable
> (what we have now) and an experimental 2.0  compiler. If that is done isn't
> that a clear signal to everyone that the 1.014 (or whatewer the version is
> at the moment) compiler is the one to use for production code?

It's getting pretty clear to me that the 1.0 series won't get any new 
features, just bug fixes, as the recent 1.015 release suggests.

The new features will all go into the 2.0 series.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list