Stepping back and looking at constness from another angle.

Walter Bright newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Thu Jun 7 22:29:06 PDT 2007


Carlos Santander wrote:
> I guess that's clear, but what does it mean when there're no parentheses?

When it has no parentheses, it behaves as a "storage class" rather than 
a "type constructor", and has the current meaning (along with all of the 
type is const, and the symbol is final).



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list