Do we need a time-out in D evolution?
Walter Bright
newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Fri Jun 8 17:07:58 PDT 2007
BCS wrote:
> Reply to Walter,
>
>> BCS wrote:
>>
>>> will the 2.0 series have an extern(D1) if and when somthing breaks
>>> linking?
>>>
>> No.
>>
>
> Bummer
It's not that it's a bad idea, it's just that it would be problematic to
implement. What if the behavior of parts of Phobos changes, and one part
of the code depends on 1 library behavior, and another part depends on
2? What if trying to accommodate both simultaneously is not practical?
How to test all those combinations?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list