Suggestion: "fix" assert(obj)

[Ary Manzana]

Why would you want to check an object's invariant? Isn't the compiler 
doing that before and after you execute a public method? What's the use 
for it?

Kristian Kilpi escribió:
> 
> This issue has been proposed before. Well, I think it's the time suggest 
> it again...
> 
> The problem is that
> 
>   assert(obj);
> 
> does not first check if 'obj' is null. It just executes the object's 
> invariants.