Publicity (was: Re: Why is 2.0 in the works already?)

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Anders Bergh wrote:

> On 6/19/07, Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
>> The only reason to worry about TIOBE, is that high rankings may boost
>> knowledge about D. As is rather obvious by looking at the list, D's
>> numbers are most likely highly inflated, and a reason for this is
>> suggested at
>>
>> http://cdsmith.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/is-tiobe-fatally-flawed/
> 
> I just read that post, and scrolling down to the comments makes the
> post less notable. Google apparently cuts results at 1000 results, and
> removes duplicates, shrinking the numbers which caused his search
> results to be even more flawed than TIOBE's.
> 

Yes, his ranking was definately wrong too, don't necessarily make TIOBE's
more correct though :) If TIOBE use Google, the argumentation would affect
them too in some form.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango