playing around with D

[Walter Bright]

Don Clugston wrote:
> Given how common static assert(0) is, I wonder if something could be 
> done to improve the error message quality in the
> "static assert(0, "xxx")" case?
> 
> file.d(58): static assert  (0) is false, "xxx"
> 
> Maybe drop out the "(0) is false" bit, since it doesn't seem to add much 
> value, changing it to something like:
> 
> file.d(58): static assert, "xxx"
> 
> Or even drop the 'static assert' bit entirely, and just display "xxx".

good ideas