digitalmars.D vs digitalmars.D.announce
Knud Soerensen
4tuu4k002 at sneakemail.com
Wed Mar 7 15:53:00 PST 2007
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:15:08 -0800, Brad Roberts wrote:
> BCS wrote:
>> Knud Soerensen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:34:38 -0800, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> It seems to me that the .announce newsgroup is being used as much
>>>> more than an announcement list. It's essentially a second version of
>>>> digitalmars.D. What would it take to change .announce back to being
>>>> an announcement only newsgroup? It'd help keep the noise down for
>>>> people who only want to track, uh, announcements.
>>>>
>>>> Sigh,
>>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>> Brad what are you talking about ??
>>> Do you suggest that people shouldn't be allow to reply on announcement,
>>> or are you say that you news read is incapable of showing a thread
>>> view ;-)
>>
>> my thought exactly
>
> The client I use is perfectly capable of threading, but that's not the
> point.
>
> The point is that the announcement newsgroup isn't being used as an
> announcement newsgroup. The purpose of having one separate from a
> general discussion newsgroup is to have a high signal low noise specific
> place for real announcements.
>
> It's not a difficult concept.
>
> Later,
> Brad
I get the concept but I don't understand your reason for the suggestion.
Why don't you just read the first post in each tread ?? (or get your
newsreader to filter everything else away.)
I really like the announcement newsgroup as it is.
Knud
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list