Extended Type Design.

[Frits van Bommel]

Dan wrote:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
> 
>> is *already* unreadable (plus I don't think that [3,17] part is legal 
>> D).  If any reasonable programmer really did have a need for such a type 
> 
> Actually, Bill, it's part of the language spec.
> http://digitalmars.com/d/arrays.html
> Look up "Rectangular Arrays"

The only thing even close to that is this:
---
In other languages, this would be called a multidimensional array and be 
declared as:

double matrix[3,3];
---
Note those first three words...