Extended Type Design.

[Sean Kelly]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> 
> So you mean foreach(reverse) then?  I do like that!  You're right that 
> it is quite D-like.  Too bad you weren't around back when 
> foreach_reverse was introduced?   ;-)

This actually came up in more general terms:

http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D.announce&artnum=5015

Perhaps I over-complicated it with the talk of parallelism, but the idea 
was still there :-)


Sean