Extended Type Design.

[Bill Baxter]

Walter Bright wrote:
> For the purposes of discussion, and to avoid confusing ourselves, we 
> adopted working names of:
> 1) final
> 2) const
> 3) super const

How about taking Andrei's observation about extern(C) and scope(exit) 
and letting const have a modifier?

1) final
2) const
3) const(strong)

or something like that?  I guess the problem is that const(something) 
already has a meaning if it's something like const(int*).

--bb