const, final, scope function parameters
janderson
askme at me.com
Sun May 27 21:43:42 PDT 2007
Walter Bright wrote:
> janderson wrote:
>> On this point, couldn't it be something like, if you define const,
>> final or scope then the default "const final scope" is removed?
>
> That was my thought, too, but that just confused things for others even
> more.
"in" seems reasonable to me. Imagine you could require either "in?, or
const, final scope in the definition or the compiler would complain.
-Joel
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list