const, final, scope function parameters

janderson askme at me.com
Sun May 27 21:43:42 PDT 2007


Walter Bright wrote:
> janderson wrote:
>> On this point, couldn't it be something like, if you define const, 
>> final or scope then the default "const final scope" is removed?
> 
> That was my thought, too, but that just confused things for others even 
> more.

"in" seems reasonable to me.  Imagine you could require either "in?, or 
const, final scope in the definition or the compiler would complain.

-Joel



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list