Reference to an object disregarding mutation - what's the trick?
Manfred Nowak
svv1999 at hotmail.com
Mon May 28 10:56:30 PDT 2007
Steve Teale wrote
> how do I get the semantics I'd get with a plain old pointer to the
> object?
You cannot use?:
Node[]* t = &node.parent.nodelist;
-manfred
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list