The future of concurrent programming

Mike Capp mike.capp at gmail.com
Tue May 29 17:01:36 PDT 2007


== Quote from Sean Kelly (sean at f4.ca)'s article

> Transactions are another idea, though the common
> implementation of software transactional memory
> (cloning objects and such) isn't really ideal.

Would genuine compiler guarantees regarding const (or invariant, or final, or
whatever it's called today) reduce the need for cloning?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list