proposal: improved import declaration

[eao197]

On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:23:02 +0400, Frits van Bommel  
<fvbommel at REMwOVExCAPSs.nl> wrote:

> This works quite nicely. I would imagine it'd work even better in build  
> utilities that can use the complete power of D (or another high-level  
> language) to parse the output instead of being restricted to  
> (interpreted) shell commands. (And it wouldn't need all of the above  
> steps, since they don't need to generate make-compatible syntax)

Thanks for your example.
I want to add support of D to my build tool which is written in Ruby. I  
think your approach can save me a lot of work in implementing dependency  
analyzer.

-- 
Regards,
Yauheni Akhotnikau