Ideas regarding flow control and loops

[Marco Aurélio]

Charles D Hixson Wrote:

> No.  Finally should be the label on a block of code that will 
> be executed *WHATEVER* happens in the preceding loop, 
> including the raising of an exception.

Hmm Yeah, now that I think about it, having it on that way would make it inconsistent with the try-catch-finally behavior... Maybe adding another keyword? or something like:

for(int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
{
    if (something)
        break;
} catch (break) {
    Foo();
}