Once Again, Feature Request: Nested classes in separate scope

downs default_357-line at yahoo.de
Tue Nov 6 11:29:16 PST 2007


Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> 
> That being said, I think you are getting stuck up on the point that if a 
> class contains a member, it owns that member *and* all data pointed to by 
> the member.  This isn't necessarily true, and is defined by the programmer, 
> not the compiler.  What the class owns is a *reference*.  Whether it owns 
> the memory pointed to by the reference or not is entirely up to you.
> 


To be brutally honest, the ownership stuff was mostly
retrojustification; what I was really after was the syntax candy :p
Ah well. Can't have everything.
 --downs



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list