Limited member function templates?

[Janice Caron]

On 11/10/07, Janice Caron <caron800 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/07, Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com> wrote:
> >   The only thing you can't have is _virtual_ member function templates.
> >   Is making them virtual what you are talking about?
>
> All member functions in D are virtual (unless you explicitly use the
> "final" keyword). So obviously, yes.

When we get the common calling convention whereby f(x) and x.f() are
interchangable, then adding non-polymorphic template functions will be
a piece of cake.

Just declare as f(T)(X x, T t) { ... } and call as x.f(t).

Maybe that will be enough. But yeah - I intended to mean "normal"
functions. Polymorphic. Virtual.