opStar

dennis luehring dl.soluz at gmx.net
Sat Nov 10 05:46:10 PST 2007


dennis luehring schrieb:
> Janice Caron schrieb:
>> So, we can write p.m for real pointers, but we have to write (*p).m
>> for classes that implement opStar()? That seems inconsistent.
>>
>> What's opStar for, if not to implement iterators?
> 
> i think the same way as in c++ - for example vector class with 
> multiplication operator
> 
> do not missunderstand the syntax "*e" wrong
> 
> a * b --> *b == *e
sorry - totaly wrong here




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list