opStar

[Janice Caron]

On 11/11/07, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote:
> On 2007-11-11 00:42:07 -0500, Walter Bright <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> said:
>
> >> What's opStar for, if not to implement iterators?
> >
> > For iterators.
>
> I've never
> like much C++ pointer-like iterators, and I don't think working with
> iterators should feel like we're manipulating pointers.

Are you aware of any primitive type other than a pointer which takes a
unary asterisk operator, for any purpose whatsoever?