opStar

[Christopher Wright]

Janice Caron wrote:
> On 11/11/07, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote:
>> On 2007-11-11 00:42:07 -0500, Walter Bright <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> said:
>>
>>>> What's opStar for, if not to implement iterators?
>>> For iterators.
>> I've never
>> like much C++ pointer-like iterators, and I don't think working with
>> iterators should feel like we're manipulating pointers.
> 
> Are you aware of any primitive type other than a pointer which takes a
> unary asterisk operator, for any purpose whatsoever?

Kleene star? If you want to call a regex a primitive type :P