opStar

[Walter Bright]

Michel Fortin wrote:
> I can't comment much on that since the details are so scarse, but I hope 
> you don't use the same syntax as in C++ for iterators. I've never like 
> much C++ pointer-like iterators, and I don't think working with 
> iterators should feel like we're manipulating pointers.


The thing is that loops are a very fundamental construct, and being to 
implement them efficiently is of major importance. The pointer idiom has 
the advantage there.