keyword __traits

[Robert Fraser]

Frank Benoit Wrote:

> When __traits was introduced, it was said, this will probably change
> again, and that "__traits" is ugly.
> 
> So I want to bring that up again, as a remainder. And also I want to ask
> for suggestions.
> 
> Why not simply have "traits" without the underscores as the keyword?

I'm down with that. The main problem is identifiers named traits (in particular, I believe std.traits, which may be used by quite a few projects).