opStar

[0ffh]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Also I noticed that if smart member access is going to be the default 
> then it seems necessary to make clear it doesn't apply to operators. 
> That is, ++p may be equivalent to p.opPreIncr generally, but that 
> doesn't mean that ++p will call p.opDeref.opPreIncr.  For that you'll 
> still need the explicit dereference: ++(*p).
> 
> Without that rule iterators will look pretty ugly.

Yup, I'd also like my pointer arithmetics to keep working...

Regards, Frank