toString vs. toUtf8

[Regan Heath]

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> Kris wrote:
> 
>> "Sean Kelly" <sean at f4.ca> wrote in message
>> [snip]
>>>> Don't know if that hurts your eyes less or not, but it seems more
>>>> consistent with Tango's existing naming convention to me than toWString,
>>>> etc.
>>> Yeah I was thinking the same thing.  It's certainly easier for me to read
>>> than the other form.
>>
>> Bill: actually, toString, toStringW and toStringD are more consistent with
>> themselves, and with Tango convention. Even toString, toString16 and
>> toString32 are significantly more style-consistent than toWString and
>> toWstring
> 
> FWIW, this would be preferable to me too.

+votes