any news on const/invariant?

[Jason House]

Walter Bright Wrote:

> Denton Cockburn wrote:
> > Any update on the status of the const/invariant changes?
> 
> Yes, it's about done.

How about documentation of how const will work.  Is this essentially what was originally posted in the "const is broken" thread?  Or are there new surprises in store for us?  


> 
> > I'm using D 2.0 in some things, and would hate to learn to do it X way,
> > only to have it changed on me.
> 
> While the semantic changes are extensive, I've found to my surprise that 
> little has to change in source code that uses const.