any news on const/invariant?

[0ffh]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> [about Classic style array declarations] And the only commentary I've
>> heard on that feature from D users has been negative. There could be a
>> "silent majority" in favor of it, but I doubt it.
> 
> But I've seen converted code that used it.

And D2 would break it? So...?
I thought one reason for forking D to D1 and D2 was to be able
to make decisions without being too afraid of breaking code?

regards, frank (being in a progressive moode)