any news on const/invariant?

[Clay Smith]

Walter Bright wrote:
> 0ffh wrote:
>> Actually, when it comes to array declaration style, I wouldn't care if 
>> the
>> old style was dropped in D. The new one works fine (for me), and there 
>> are
>> some good arguments for having just OWTDI.
> 
> For new code, there isn't much point to using the C style array 
> declarations. But when you're translating a big chunk of C code, it's a 
> time and bug saver. Converting the array declarations from C style to D 
> style is surprisingly error prone and rather tedious. It cannot be 
> automated with simple string editors.

I agree, it is useful to help port C/C++ code to D.