Hack to name unit tests?
Christopher Wright
dhasenan at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 16:22:18 PST 2007
Dan wrote:
> Eww... no. You guys are suggesting that code provability is useless in D because it's "too complicated" and then go on to suggest it can be used as a heavily over-classed debug statement.
<snip>
I don't know what thread you meant to reply to. This is only about
naming tests somehow, not about proving anything about test coverage. Or
am I confused about something?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list