Hack to name unit tests?

Christopher Wright dhasenan at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 16:22:18 PST 2007


Dan wrote:
> Eww... no.  You guys are suggesting that code provability is useless in D because it's "too complicated" and then go on to suggest it can be used as a heavily over-classed debug statement.
<snip>

I don't know what thread you meant to reply to. This is only about
naming tests somehow, not about proving anything about test coverage. Or 
am I confused about something?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list