"Phango" container classes

[Janice Caron]

On 10/2/07, 0ffh <spam at frankhirsch.net> wrote:
> BTW I hope this is not too OT, but:
> I have not much idea of the Phobos and Tango internals, but as I read it
> it would mostly be the distinct object (and exception?) classes that
> make the most trouble in making those libs compatible, or am I mistaken?

I suspect there are a lot of people who are happy enough with Phobos's
objects and exceptions, but who wouldn't say no to a few extra snazzy
container and string classes.